Let me provide some context. Axios published this at the end of January. Long story short, big tech (Facebook at al) have spotted that little tech (Substack et al) are making some inroads in the ‘pay me for my stuff’ space and so have decided to set out to do the same. LinkedIn is the latest to join the fray and announced its move into this space last week.
I know at least one person who as a matter of principle, would never ever ‘monetize their network’ - whilst others have lists that they use to connect with people on a regular basis, with the intent of ‘lightening their wallet’.
It’s an interesting dichotomy. Friends are friends after all. But if you are prepared to have a complete stranger pay you for something. Why wouldn’t you charge a friend?
I have my own thoughts - but first … to borrow (for free) from one of my favorite people … what do you think?
Question Four in this series of newsletters that I wrote about here.
Please do comment, email, call or even use carrier pigeon so we can continue the dialogue. I want to bring together the collective wisdom of people and share it.
Answers to last week’s question will be in your inbox at 8.00 am Friday, PST this week.
I have a brilliant and incisive reply, written, and ready to go. Please send 5 dollars to my PayPal account for your one-time access. (I also accept Venmo, BitCoin, and strings of painted beads.)
People pay for content, and people pay for quality content. Content meaning knowledge, wisdom, mastery, years of thinking, creative energies etc. So suggest its also looking at what can be offered for free and the generosity for that and what goes behind a paywall and why. After all, people pay for plenty of other things. Why not quality writing, audio and visual assets? So yes I pay for plenty of all of the above, as I think its worth it to do so. And I certainly to do not expect everything for free.